1000x447 blog default image

Can your board face Warren Buffett?

Balaji KrishnamurthyMay 1, 2008

Each of us have our own favorite example of a poorly performing public company with an entrenched board, and we wonder why they have not taken any action with so many quarters of poor performance. This pattern seems to be more common amongst smaller public companies that fly below the radar of corporate raiders and the big private equity firms.

For boards of smaller public companies, we offer a provocative exercise.

Directors of a small public company board, while theoretically answerable to the shareholders, are in no practical danger of being thrown out of the job. Conscientious directors of such companies should ask themselves if they would survive a rigorous scrutiny – which we call the Warren Buffett test.

Warren Buffett is used merely as an icon of a smart, simple investor with a no-nonsense, no-hype attitude. Imagine that your company is entirely owned by Warren Buffett, who has left the board and management intact. Further, imagine that the Chairman of the board, or the lead independent director, had to make a trip out to Omaha, Nebraska after every board meeting and explain to Buffett the performance of the company and what the board and management are doing to improve it. Ask yourself the kind of questions that Buffett would ask and discuss if he would exhibit the same patience with you as a board that you have demonstrated with management. This discussion could even be conducted during the independent directors’ session with one of the directors playing the role of Warren Buffett. We posit that this exercise, conducted with integrity, will give pause to some directors of poorly performing companies.

Food for Thought is our way of sharing interesting concepts on corporate leadership and management with others who might find it useful. The thoughts offered are intended to be controversial and thought provoking. They are intended to help our readers intentionally realize their potential, what we call Potentionality.

Up Next